Human And Non Human Animals - 1791 Words

With several scientifically verifiable differences between human and non-human animals, there are major similarities in terms of biological make ups, livelihood requirements, and life cycles. Major differences are cited on the grounds of brain functionality and response to various environmental stimuli. Basing the whole argument on the differences in the mental capabilities of both human and non-human animals, the latter is viewed as less being that is vulnerable and that requires support, protection and general care. In regard to this, therefore, there have been major discriminations against the non-human animals whereby human has exploited other non-human animals in their day to day life. All the acts of unjustified differentials in moral considerations mainly trace their roots on the observed differences in mental capacities between these species. This paper presents how morality can sustain an opposition between human and non-human animals. The position of the animals’ wel fare that presents the prevailing viewpoint for looking into human’s moral as well as legal mandate to the non-human animals, holds to the fact that the life of animals is less valued compared to human’s life. Therefore, animals can be used as human’s resources and wealth as long as they are treated ‘humanely’ without inflicting unnecessary pain and suffering. This position presents animals as being self-unaware, thus living in eternal present caring less about continuing their lives as generallyShow MoreRelatedTreatment of Non-Human Animals2104 Words   |  9 Pagesaccord moral consideration to sentient beings equally, in this case non-human animals. I will illustrate under Utilitarian criteria, that non-human animals are indeed sentient and that it is enough to count for moral standing. I will defend my argument in examples of practices commonly used in treating animals a resource, such as for food and in laboratory experiments. This will prove t hat any action that fails to treat animals as a being with moral standing violates an animal’s right, and thereforeRead MoreInfluencing The Lives Of Non Human Animals1381 Words   |  6 PagesInfluencing the lives of non-human animals for centuries, animals have led to appreciable advancement in society. The interactions that occur between people and non-human animals, particularly in the Appalachian region, has led to profound changes both on the local community and the nation. The most significant interaction to take place and has influenced the area drastically is domestication. Four types of domestication at the forefront of Appalachian culture are livestock, blood-sports, pet keepingRead MoreThe Factors Influencing Human Behaviour Outside Of Other Non Human Animals1373 Words   |  6 PagesAnimals are one of the top factors influencing human behavior outside of other non-human animals. The interactions that occur between people and non-human animals, particularly in th e Appalachian region, has led to profound changes both on the local community. The most significant interaction to take place and has influenced the area drastically is domestication. Four types of domestication at the forefront of Appalachian culture are livestock, blood-sports, pet keeping, and animal’s prevalence inRead MoreAccepting Non Human Animals As Our Moral Equals Essay1518 Words   |  7 Pages2367 Accepting Non-Human Animals as Our Moral Equals In her essay Speaking of Animal Rights, Warren (1987) argues for the weak animal rights position, which holds that non-human animals have weaker rights than human beings because non-human animals do not have the same moral status as us human beings (383-4). This is due to their lack of the ability to â€Å"reason well enough to function as autonomous moral agents† (385), which she believes is a requirement for being moral of human beings (384-5). InRead MoreEssay on The Use of Non-Human Animals in Psychological Research574 Words   |  3 PagesUse of Non-Human Animals in Psychological Research Animals used in research have proved to be an important factor for the uses of medicine, for example Flemming found the use of penicillin was an effective antibiotic when it was used on mice. Since 1822, legislation has limited how scientists use animals. In the UK, the use of animals in psychological investigations has been constrained by ethical and moral guidelines. Current UK legislation in the Animals ScientificRead MoreDifferent Opinions Of People From Non Human Animals And Non Livings1261 Words   |  6 Pagesaltruism, egoism, good and evil. It is no doubt that human beings possess either one or any of these characteristics, which make them unique. It is safe to say that our actions, beliefs, and choices separate us from animals and non-livings. The 20th century English philosopher, Martin Hollis, once said, â€Å"Free will – the ability to make decisions about how to act – is what distinguishes people from non-human animals and machines 1†. He went to describe human beings as â€Å"self conscious, rational, creativeRead MoreAnimal Abuse Is The Act Of Cruelty And Infliction Of Pain On Non Human Animals1120 Words   |  5 Pages1 Jonathan Corbin Ms. Powell English 1020 5 Nov, 2015 Animal Abuse Animal abuse is the act of cruelty and infliction of pain on non-human animals. Dogs are the most common victims of the abuse. How do you feel about people abusing poor, innocent animals? I strongly believe there should be a greater punishment for the crimes committed.The controversy has grown greatly in the last few years with the increase of most abuse cases. Animal rights activists are working hard to bring success intoRead MoreDo Humans Have Moral Obligations On Human Animals? Essay1587 Words   |  7 PagesDo humans have moral obligations to mon-human animals? Oxford English dictionary defines moral as â€Å"of or relating to human character or behavior considered as right and wrong,† and obligation as â€Å"an act or course of action to which a person is morally or legally bound.† Accordingly, the term â€Å"moral obligations† can be interpreted as duties that arise out of humans’ consideration of right and wrong. In other words, it is up to humans to judge and decide whether or not certain actions toward non-humanRead MoreThe Two Principles Of A Basis Of Our Brain Capacity, Ability, And Preferences Of Life1698 Words   |  7 Pagesproblem at hand is that majority humans believe we are superior to non-human animals on the basis of our brain capacity, ability, and preferences of life. The two principles of consequentialism I plan to work with is the two that consequentialism are based on: 1. Whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the results of that act. 2. The better consequences an act produces, the better or more right that act.   These two principles play a part in non-human animal inequality because it emphasizesRead MoreAnimal Testing is Wrong! Essay923 Words   |  4 Pagesthis is how animals everyday are treated, we have to stop this now! Millions of animals are killed in laboratories everyday with no chance to object to what the testers are about to do to them. Animals feel as much pain as humans do so why does it make it okay to test on them when they are so alike to humans? Every day people test makeup, shampoos, and medicines on animals, the strange thing is that animals have different skin, hair, and internal organs than humans have. Since the animals have different